SARASOTA
COUNTY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
School
Advisory Council
Minutes
April 1, 2003
MEMBERS Present: Gene Witt, Peter Straw, Alice
Higgins, George McGonagill, Roland Piccone, Mickey Anderson, Tim White, Bill
Costello, Regina Stinson, Jerome Greenstein, David Winterrowd, Bruce Andersen
MEMBERS Absent: Norm
Stockton, Lynn Whisman, Harriette Laronge, Suzanne Jones, Ron Turner, Paige
Eastman, Judith Ferrell, Jenna Mitchell
GUESTS Present:
Sandra Holley, Bruce Hinson, Barbara Witte, Eddy
Boynton, Mary Ribaudo, Art Gaudet, Terri Minter, Roland Chalbot
I. Welcome by
Chairperson
Peter
called the meeting to order and welcomed the group.
All
members and guests introduced themselves.
Carol
Darling asked the members of the committee to indicate their intention to
attend the two dinners and one luncheon during the COE/SACS visit.
II. Minutes of the last meeting on March
11
The minutes were reviewed and a
correction was made to page 2 of 3.The COE/SACS Strategic Plan for Excellence
was presented by Peter Straw for Carol Darling. Also, a typographical error was made on page 2, paragraph 2:
“thins” should be things. Bill moved that the minutes of the last meeting be
approved and Mickey seconded the motion.
III. The Budget for 2003-2004
The purpose of the meeting was to
discuss the budget for SCTI. Gene
expressed his appreciation for the participation of the group members. There was a one-week time frame for the
budget. He wanted to get questions and
answers on the table and perhaps have one more meeting, if necessary.
Gene told the group that Bruce was
involved in the staffing and budget and was online to present the
staffing/program-planning portion of the proposed budget. The process was lengthened by the transfer
of all or most of the ACEC staff from the Landings. All of the data is not available on the ACEC staff transfers.
A.
Bruce presented three challenges that face SCTI for the
2003-2004 school year.
1. Integrate ACEC
and SCTI
i.
Use personnel efficiently
ii.
Streamline to reduce or eliminate duplication
iii.
Capitalize on economy of scale
iv.
Establish structure for the future
v.
Use the strengths of the staff
2. Review SCTI
Systems
i.
Program efficiency
ii.
Enrollment trends
iii.
Support services
iv.
Review and improve processes
3. Establish
Future SCTI Direction and Focus
i.
Technical High School?
ii.
Adult education and training needs
iii.
Workforce needs
iv.
Community needs
B.
Ken distributed the 2003-2004 Budget. A district staff person, who made an
assumption by increasing the part time hours, completed the budget. Page 1 was Workforce Development, page 2
FEFP, page 3 the referendum funds, page 4 fee support money, page 5 allocation
by category. Part of the problem with
the current budget, according to Ken, is the collapse of ACTI, ACEC, and the
1300 Group into one. The control of the
budget this year is at SCTI. Last year
the consumables, travel, and equipment category in the budget totaled $550,000
for all three groups. This year, the
consumables, travel, and equipment category totals $200,000, for all three
groups collapsed into one. According to
Ken, the three groups cannot survive on the budget for this category. Ken stressed that the unification of the two
schools is good. The schools can make each other successful. Each school will be more aware of the needs
of the other and the two schools will be more efficient with their resources.
C.
There are 188 staff members on the SCTI and ACEC staff. ACEC will keep 8 full time employees to run
the adult enrichment area. The rest
(180) are SCTI. The administration only
has an unofficial list of ACEC employees.
Gene indicated that a real list has been requested from Human
Resources. The administration used
assumptions to develop the 2003-2004 budget.
They considered staffing and organization. The will be looking for a good fit for vacancies that exist. George pointed out that the overall
reduction is approximately $600,000.
Tim inquired about the date on which the decision was made to unite SCTI
and ACEC. Ken and Gene indicated that
it was February 18. Tim was also
concerned about a decision regarding the personnel who will be transferred to
SCTI and those that will not. Gene
responded that decisions had to be made at the Landings and the administrators
made some assumptions when they budgeted.
D.
Program changes are as follows:
Construction .6
Lodging Operations close
Nursery /Landscape Operations .6
Phlebotomy .6
Medical Lab Assisting .6
Public Works .6 (Fee based Program)
Machine Tools close
During the
next year, administration, SAC, and SDMT will look at how the programs can be
revamped and made vital again.
Expansion is
possible in Auto Tech, Cosmetology, and Health.
Bruce
indicated that the community would be contacted to determine their needs and
SCTI could develop a program to support this.
As enrollment and desire increase, changes will be made.
Art Gaudet
indicated that both programs started in 2002.
Both have a pre-apprenticeship component. The count of students given for January 20 does not add up to the
actual enrollment at present and fee support students are not included in the
count. The construction industry has
pushed for a recruiter, Karen Wilson. The contractors pay for the recruitment
and the equipment has been donated. At
night, part time instructors teach the apprenticeship programs. Sandra indicated that the apprenticeship
programs are self-sustaining and self-sufficient. They do not generate FTE dollars.
George spoke
to the loyalty issue with construction workers in recent years. Competitors have an advantage when one
employer educates an employee. They
offer them a slight increase in pay and the employee will change jobs. Tim said that that competition was a reality
in all industries. Roland asked about
MTI. Sandra informed the group that MTI
has the population base and the labor pool.
They hired marketing people and they turned their situation around in
the last five years. Apprenticeships
will not suffer as a result of the .6 position. The working class has shifted to Manatee and Charlotte counties
because they cannot afford the housing in Sarasota County.
Mickey
reported that MTI has 310 high school students and 95% of them are adult
students.
Bruce and
Peter agreed to curriculum revamping, community outreach, resource commitment,
and business community involvement in seeking more enrollment for these
programs.
E.
Roland Chalbot spoke about the Machining program. It is only been in existence for two
years. He had his first two completers
Thursday. The enrollment went from 0 to
6 adult students (at one point had 9).
The high school Engineering Assisting program is not even in the school
catalog. Manatee and Sarasota are
pursuing apprenticeship element because of the machine shops in Manatee
County. He feels strong support from
his volunteers. Gene complimented
Roland on his recruitment efforts. Perhaps a champion in the industry can be
found to fund the position.
F.
Tim reminded the group to think “outside the box” through
marketing and packaging programs. Since
he became a volunteer involved at SCTI in 1989, marketing and packaging of
programs have been problems. Marketing can and will work.
G.
Mary indicated that the blending of SCTI and ACEC will
provide some progression for students from the ACEC programs to the training
programs.
H.
Ken reminded the group to focus on the budget. OCPs matter. Cosmo has one OCP and is 1300 hours in length. Auto has 6 or 7 OCPs. We only get extra dollars when people hit
the OCPs. We get 85% of last year as a
basis of this year on the budget.
Remainder if from OCPs form the prior year and placements from two years
ago. Other budgets (K-12 and
university) have grown and ours has remained the same.
I.
Gene and Ken noted that workforce education is underfunded
on a student-by-student basis. Mary
said that 95% of program completers are tracked. Less than 5% cannot be located.
The placement is about 90%.
Those who are working, in the military, or continuing their education
are counted as a placement.
J.
Janice Sean, SDMT Vice Chairperson, presented the recommendations
of the SDMT.
·
Reconsider decreasing staff hours in Construction and
Phlebotomy.
·
Reconsider using funds being allotted for instructor on
special assignment, who are not in the classroom with students and use these
funds for existing programs which directly serve students.
·
Reconsider combining the ACEC budget since we are all one
starting in July.
·
Request the Sarasota School Board to reconsider their
action: taking the $1,000,000 from the SCTI budget due to an insurance claim.
·
In the future, involve the SDMT earlier in the
decision-making process and supply the SDMT with the budget information in a
timely manner to enable the SDMT to do its job.
K.
George inquired about the impact of the changes. Ken assumes that $560,000 will be saved and
there will be a contingency fund.
L.
David inquired about the number of students in ACEC. Barbara Witte reported that there are 400
adult, 800 ABE/GED, 400 Corrections, and 900 ESOL. With 534 high school students, that brings the total at SCTI to
3754 students.
M.
There is no line item for marketing. It is necessary to use internal funds for
create a line item. Bruce will use internal funds to fund marketing. He will
also use focus groups.
N.
Jerry suggested that there should be a combined SDMT and SAC
Task Force and that it should be created as soon as possible.
O.
Mickey suggested the creation of a method of understanding
the segments of the budget. Gene said
that a part of the agenda should be devoted to that at every meeting.
P.
George moved that SAC approve the budget as presented. Jerry seconded. The motion was approved
unanimously.
Q.
Mickey suggested a change to the method for next year, and
that SAC be included in the process earlier.
George noted that SCTI has control of the distribution this year, and
that fact is positive.
R.
Gene emphasized that a year round, concentrated marketing
program is needed, with emphasis on the programs with low enrollment. The
equipment budget is also inadequate.
S.
Peter also emphasized the need for new revenue sources and
more effective marketing.
Mickey moved that the meeting be
adjourned. Jerry seconded.
Next Meeting: Monday, April 14,
2003, 6 pm.
Mission Statement: The Sarasota County
Technical Institute provides quality technical education to meet workforce
development and community needs.